The 3 Body Problem connected with a massive amount of people, all at once. It factually presented that the essentially modern human brain existed over 100,000 years ago. It took humans 90,000 years to get from hunter gatherers to farmers, 10,00 more years to become industrialist, 200 more years to get to Atomic power and approximately 50 more years to space travel, computers, the information age and global communications.
It is theorized that the first modern human brain had the same capacity and ability to process information as we do now. What made the difference? Population and culture. More brain power to remember, innovate and specialize, to produce the next Newton or Leonardo.
We are told that we only use a percentage of our brain capacity, that we think we know.
Over 100 billion people have lived and died. How does a baby know how to laugh? To reach the same conclusion that something is funny or react to something that is funny the same as an adult does, without being taught that. That one thought was my quagmire for which extrication to a resolve led me to explore what I thought I knew and what else I wanted to know. An awakening of sorts.
Do people communicate to others without knowing. If you don't know, then you don't know what you are communicating, or receiving. Do my thoughts have mass? If so, then I should weigh a thousand tons. Because I know I do not weigh 2 million pounds, my thoughts had to go somewhere.
I think of all the people that have existed. The spark that created their life. A pair of protons that exist forever. Lives that we may all share something and do not, yet, know how to process that information on a conscious level.
If we project reality as you suggested in your video, that reality had to come from somewhere. And if we all project the same reality, then we somehow share, communicate, that reality with each other. Which leads me back to to the start. Over the next 50 years there will be billions more people on earth. That's a lot more shared projected realities going on. What new information will be invented... or unlocked?
If people get busy sharing more, maybe there will be a way for me to be around to see it.
I rhyme with ease, but i can't really stomach "poetry"!!
So, I've never studied any Shakespeare stuff, tho I like this kind of peeling back the curtains behind the history stuff.
It's just in this past couple of weeks that I've found all this detailed Oxfordian Vs Stamfordian argument over who actually wrote what and when.
Oxfordian, because Edward deVere was 17th Earl of Oxford - and these acedemics have done the work to show conclusively that deVere was a highly educated progeny with words & had good reason to need to cloak his real name, because he was nobility, and was a key player in the Queen's Court, and had a vested interest in maintaining Royal-bloodline lineages, in Protestant rather than Catholic ascendancy.
Whereas, Shakespeare being from Stratford, uneducated, non-royal, with no involvement with either theatre of Court, could not possibly be the real identity behind the plays or sonnets.
I posted the videos that show the insights into why and how, as well as the sacred geometry, TAU artistry & art history in the 2 most recent substack posts I made - here https://kelfin.substack.com/.../shakespeares-dee-cypher...
The 3 Body Problem connected with a massive amount of people, all at once. It factually presented that the essentially modern human brain existed over 100,000 years ago. It took humans 90,000 years to get from hunter gatherers to farmers, 10,00 more years to become industrialist, 200 more years to get to Atomic power and approximately 50 more years to space travel, computers, the information age and global communications.
It is theorized that the first modern human brain had the same capacity and ability to process information as we do now. What made the difference? Population and culture. More brain power to remember, innovate and specialize, to produce the next Newton or Leonardo.
We are told that we only use a percentage of our brain capacity, that we think we know.
Over 100 billion people have lived and died. How does a baby know how to laugh? To reach the same conclusion that something is funny or react to something that is funny the same as an adult does, without being taught that. That one thought was my quagmire for which extrication to a resolve led me to explore what I thought I knew and what else I wanted to know. An awakening of sorts.
Do people communicate to others without knowing. If you don't know, then you don't know what you are communicating, or receiving. Do my thoughts have mass? If so, then I should weigh a thousand tons. Because I know I do not weigh 2 million pounds, my thoughts had to go somewhere.
I think of all the people that have existed. The spark that created their life. A pair of protons that exist forever. Lives that we may all share something and do not, yet, know how to process that information on a conscious level.
If we project reality as you suggested in your video, that reality had to come from somewhere. And if we all project the same reality, then we somehow share, communicate, that reality with each other. Which leads me back to to the start. Over the next 50 years there will be billions more people on earth. That's a lot more shared projected realities going on. What new information will be invented... or unlocked?
If people get busy sharing more, maybe there will be a way for me to be around to see it.
Time frames consciousness, a port hole through which we get born.
Time will tell...
We know only a ledge end
I rhyme with ease, but i can't really stomach "poetry"!!
So, I've never studied any Shakespeare stuff, tho I like this kind of peeling back the curtains behind the history stuff.
It's just in this past couple of weeks that I've found all this detailed Oxfordian Vs Stamfordian argument over who actually wrote what and when.
Oxfordian, because Edward deVere was 17th Earl of Oxford - and these acedemics have done the work to show conclusively that deVere was a highly educated progeny with words & had good reason to need to cloak his real name, because he was nobility, and was a key player in the Queen's Court, and had a vested interest in maintaining Royal-bloodline lineages, in Protestant rather than Catholic ascendancy.
Whereas, Shakespeare being from Stratford, uneducated, non-royal, with no involvement with either theatre of Court, could not possibly be the real identity behind the plays or sonnets.
I posted the videos that show the insights into why and how, as well as the sacred geometry, TAU artistry & art history in the 2 most recent substack posts I made - here https://kelfin.substack.com/.../shakespeares-dee-cypher...
&
here
https://kelfin.substack.com/.../john-dee-de-vere-and...
& here - my 3rd last post, was about The Word, from the Printing Press to Post Humans, programming the masses with Stories, stored in our memories
https://kelfin.substack.com/p/god-the-words-a-verb
Shakespeare's Dee Cypher de Ver